Wandere aus, solange es noch geht - Finca Bayano in Panama!
Seite 2 von 6 ErsteErste 123456 LetzteLetzte
Ergebnis 11 bis 20 von 60
  1. #11

    AW: Prozeßbeginn Amoklauf in Fort Hood

    Pentagon Taps Anti-Christian Extremist for Religious Tolerance Policy




    by Ken Klukowski 28 Apr 2013 1269 post a comment
    “Today, we face incredibly well-funded gangs of fundamentalist Christian monsters who terrorize their fellow Americans by forcing their weaponized and twisted version of Christianity upon their helpless subordinates in our nation’s armed forces.”

    Those words were recently written by Mikey Weinstein, founder of the Military Religious Freedom Foundation (MRFF), in a column he wrote for the Huffington Post. Weinstein will be a consultant to the Pentagon to develop new policies on religious tolerance, including a policy for court-martialing military chaplains who share the Christian Gospel during spiritual counseling of American troops.
    Weinstein decries what he calls the “virulent religious oppression” perpetrated by conservative Christians, whom he refers to as “monstrosities” and “pitiable unconstitutional carpetbaggers,” comparing them to “bigots” in the Deep South during the civil rights era.
    He cites Dr. James Dobson—the famous Christian founder of Focus on the Family—as “illustrating the extremist, militant nature of these virulently homophobic organizations’ rhetorically-charged propaganda.” Regarding those who teach orthodox Christian beliefs from the Bible, Weinstein concludes, “Let’s call these ignoble actions what they are: the senseless and cowardly squallings of human monsters.”
    Weinstein then endorses the ultra-left Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), who publishes a list of “hate groups.” Alongside truly deplorable organizations like the KKK, the SPLC’s list includes a host of traditional Christian organizations (for their support of traditional marriage) and Tea Party organizations (for supporting limited government). Weinstein says SPLC correctly labels them all as “hate groups.”
    Floyd Lee Corkins—the first person ever convicted of domestic terrorism in federal court under the laws of Washington, D.C.—told the FBI that he chose his intended shooting spree targets from the SPLC website's map. Corkins was arrested at the offices of the Family Research Council (FRC) after shooting a security guard in August 2012. His court documents state that Corkins intended to kill as many people as possible.
    Weinstein also supports Lt. Col. Jack Rich, the Army officer who wrote to subordinate officers that soldiers who hold traditional Christian beliefs agreeing with organizations on SPLC’s “hate group” list are incompatible with “Army values" and should be carefully watched and excluded from military service.
    According to Weinstein, “We should as a nation effusively applaud Lt. Col. Rich.” He adds that the nation should “venture further” than Rich’s recommendations, saying, “We MUST vigorously support the continuing efforts to expose pathologically anti-gay, Islamaphobic, and rabidly intolerant agitators for what they are: die-hard enemies of the United States Constitution. Monsters, one and all. To do anything less would be to roll out a red carpet to those who would usher in a blood-drenched, draconian era of persecutions, nationalistic militarism, and superstitious theocracy.”
    Many media outlets are silent on this disturbing new alliance between fanatical secularists and leaders in the Pentagon appointed by President Barack Obama and Secretary Chuck Hagel, under which the U.S. military would officially consult with someone with such foaming-at-the-mouth passionate hostility toward traditional Christians, including Evangelicals and devout Catholics. The military—America’s most heroic and noble institution—includes countless people of faith, and this represents a radical departure from the U.S. military’s warm embrace of people of faith in its ranks.
    Yet the little coverage this story is getting is positive, such as this Washington Post column that somehow manages not to carry any of these frightening quotes from Weinstein and instead actually endorses the Pentagon’s meeting with him. Sally Quinn’s Post column also approvingly quotes MRFF Advisory Board member Larry Wilkerson as saying, “Sexual assault and proselytizing, according to Wilkerson, ‘are absolutely destructive of the bonds that keep soldiers together.’”
    Did you get that? They say having someone share the Christian gospel with you is akin to being raped. Weinstein makes sure there are no doubts, being quoted by the Post as adding, “This is a national security threat. What is happening [aside from sexual assault] is spiritual rape. And what the Pentagon needs is to understand is that it is sedition and treason. It should be punished.”
    Another MRFF Advisory Board member, Ambassador Joe Wilson (the far-left husband of CIA employee Valerie Plame from the Iraq War’s yellow-cake uranium scandal a decade ago), said a military chaplain “is to minister to spiritual needs. You don’t proselytize. It’s a workplace violation.”
    In other words, it should be the official policy of the United States to decree what a human being’s spiritual needs are, and punish for violations a military officer who is an ordained clergyman who attempts to share his own personal faith with another service member when discussing religious matters. You cannot imagine such a thing ever happening under any previous president.
    Weinstein goes on:
    If these fundamentalist Christian monsters of human degradation … and tyranny cannot broker or barter your acceptance of their putrid theology, then they crave for your universal silence in the face of their rapacious reign of theocratic terror. Indeed, they ceaselessly lust, ache, and pine for you to do absolutely nothing to thwart their oppression. Comply, my friends, and you become as monstrously savage as are they. I beg you, do not feed these hideous monsters with your stoic lethargy, callousness and neutrality. Do not lubricate the path of their racism, bigotry, and prejudice. Doing so directly threatens the national security of our beautiful nation.
    God help us now when someone with such visceral hatred of conservative Christians—literally tens of millions of Americans—who says sharing this gospel is “spiritual rape” is helping develop policies for how to deal with Christians in the military.
    Weinstein says those guilty of this “treason” must be “punished.” Under federal law, the penalty for treason is death. And the Obama administration is sitting down to talk with this man to craft new policies for “religious tolerance” in our military.
    Breitbart News legal columnist Ken Klukowski is senior fellow for religious liberty at the Family Research Council and on faculty at Liberty University School of Law.

    ttp://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2013/04/28/Pentagon-Consults-Extremist-Who-Calls-Christians-Monsters-and-Enemies-of-the-Constitution-to-Develop-Religious-Tolerance-Policy

  2. #12

    AW: Prozeßbeginn Amoklauf in Fort Hood

    *****************

    Obama's ICON is Islamic Sharia Compliance Banner - Islam Rising Over America





    http://www.alipac.us/f9/obamas-icon-...merica-277420/


    Ist zwar ein interessanter Ansatz, aber seit wann ist Islam weiß symbolisiert? Das wäre doch grün (was wiederuzm nicht in die Farbskala der amerikanischen Flagge paßt.


    Fallas man die Farben politisch oder religiös zuordnen will, könnte man eher so rangehen: Amerika ist der Weg und Israel (da blau) das Ziel oder hält schützend seine Hand drüber oder so ähnlich.
    Geändert von burgfee (07.05.2013 um 23:06 Uhr)

  3. #13

    AW: Prozeßbeginn Amoklauf in Fort Hood

    NASA feuert Amerikaner und heuert tausende Muslime an.

    NASA FIRING AMERICANS & HIRING MUSLIMS.... BY THE THOUSANDS




    NASA FIRING AMERICANS & HIRING MUSLIMS.... BY THE THOUSANDS

    Administrator Charles Bolden and a delegation of several other NASA officials arrive in Saudi Arabia on Friday following a trip to Prague. From the Middle East, they will head next to Nepal where Bolden will give a keynote address at a climate change conference. Despite the fact Congress finally passed the three-year $58 billion NASA Auth
    orization Act late Wednesday night, hundreds of space workers found themselves without jobs Friday.

    Some could be blamed on the uncertainty that has hung over the space program for the past nine months, but most were because of the space shuttle's pending retirement.

    United Space Alliance laid off 333 employees who worked here in the Johnson Space Center area Friday, as planned, and Bay Area Houston Economic Partnership President Bob Mitchell said "at least an additional 400" were being laid off at aerospace firms, big and small, all around the area as the week came to an end.

    Jacobs Engineering laid off 129 employees at its Clear Lake offices just two weeks ago.

    USA Communications Manager Kari Fluegel said Friday that her company had also laid off an additional 1,222 employees in Florida and Alabama. Almost 800 were terminated at Cape Canaveral. The Huntsville, Ala., newspaper reported that from 150 to 250 space workers were being laid off as NASA switched from one rocket program to another and that some were expecting to come back when work starts on the new program. That won't be all the layoffs at USA.

    Fruegel said "we'll initiate the next layoff in January when another 200 to 300 will be laid off. We'll start that process in October with notices given out in about 60 days."

    It is compelling that at the same time NASA
    Chief Bolden is reaching out to Muslims in Saudi Arabia, Americans by the thousands are being laid off as part of the Obama's retooling of the space agency.

    Before It's News says America, meet your new Islamic Astronauts.

    Three Muslims from the United Arab Emirates have been selected for space training at NASA, or what's left of it.

    Mr Bani Malek , Hamad Rajab and Shamma al Qassim are from the Arab Youth Venture Foundation, an organization in RAK, for the Educational Associates program, which was previously reserved only for US citizens. While I have nothing against these people or the UAE, shouldn't Us Citizens come first?

    When you add up benefits for illegal aliens and rights for terrorists, it seems US Citizens are always last in line in their own country.

    America, welcome to your new Islamic Space Program -- courtesy of Barak Hussein Obama!

    http://www.godlikeproductions.com/fo...age2216469/pg1

    http://www.theobamafile.com/_Islam

    /ObamasMuslims.htm

    http://genomega1.wordpress.com/2013/...the-thousands/

    http://genomega1.wordpress.com/2013/...the-thousands/

    Last edited by AirborneSapper7; 04-30-2013 at 08:36 PM.
    http://www.alipac.us/f9/nasa-firing-...8/#post1341606

  4. #14

    AW: Prozeßbeginn Amoklauf in Fort Hood

    Das Obama-Logo erinnert mich an die Werbung von Signal-Zahnpasta


  5. #15
    Registriert seit
    08.05.2013
    Beiträge
    118

    AW: Prozeßbeginn Amoklauf in Fort Hood

    Das ist eine Vermutung und damit rassistisch!

  6. #16
    Registriert seit
    22.05.2012
    Alter
    36
    Beiträge
    2.851

    AW: Prozeßbeginn Amoklauf in Fort Hood

    Zitat Zitat von yasin12 Beitrag anzeigen
    Das ist eine Vermutung und damit rassistisch!
    Vermutungen = Rassismus ?

    was bist du denn für einer?
    "Die glücklichen Sklaven sind die erbittertsten Feinde der Freiheit"

  7. #17
    Registriert seit
    08.05.2013
    Beiträge
    118

    AW: Prozeßbeginn Amoklauf in Fort Hood

    Zitat Zitat von malignus Beitrag anzeigen
    Vermutungen = Rassismus ?

    was bist du denn für einer?
    Habe ich das geschrieben? Nein! Ich habe geschrieben, dass deine Aussage rassistisch ist, weil es nur eine Vermutung ohne irgend ein Fakt oder Hintergrund ist! Du projizierst von einer Aussage zu einer anderen, ohne jeglichen Beweis, das ist eine Vermutung. Und diese Vermutung ist rassistischer Natur weil sie gegen eine bestimmte Gruppe gerichtet ist und negativ ist!

  8. #18
    Registriert seit
    13.07.2010
    Beiträge
    57.870

    AW: Prozeßbeginn Amoklauf in Fort Hood

    Und wen hast du gemeint?
    Alle Texte, die keine Quellenangaben haben, stammen von mir.

  9. #19
    Registriert seit
    08.05.2013
    Beiträge
    118

    AW: Prozeßbeginn Amoklauf in Fort Hood

    dich!

  10. #20
    Registriert seit
    25.04.2011
    Beiträge
    32.222
    Blog-Einträge
    1

    AW: Prozeßbeginn Amoklauf in Fort Hood

    Zitat Zitat von yasin12 Beitrag anzeigen
    Das ist eine Vermutung und damit rassistisch!
    Seit wann sind Vermutungen rassistisch? Das erklärst du mir aber mal, Junge!

Seite 2 von 6 ErsteErste 123456 LetzteLetzte

Aktive Benutzer

Aktive Benutzer

Aktive Benutzer in diesem Thema: 1 (Registrierte Benutzer: 0, Gäste: 1)

Berechtigungen

  • Neue Themen erstellen: Nein
  • Themen beantworten: Nein
  • Anhänge hochladen: Nein
  • Beiträge bearbeiten: Nein
  •