Wandere aus, solange es noch geht - Finca Bayano in Panama!
Seite 2 von 2 ErsteErste 12
Ergebnis 11 bis 14 von 14
  1. #11

    AW: Fatwa - Frauen mit Mobiltelefon dürfen mit Säure angegriffen werden

    while former Pakistani lawmaker and prominent cleric Maulana Abdul Haleem announced that secular women working with NGO’s can be captured and forcibly “married” to local men if they dare work on women’s education, health, or welfare projects in the district of Kohistan.
    Whether the women would be trapped there indefinitely in the conventional meaning of “marriage,“ or if it would be a ”temporary marriage” that sometimes enables affairs, prostitution, or worse, is unclear.
    Zitat aus Beitrag #2

    Während der frühere pakistanische Gesetzesmacher und Kleriker Maulana Abdul Haleem verkündete, daß säkulare Frauen, die für Nichtregierungsorganisationen arrbeiten entführt und gewaltsam mit Männern der Umgebung zwangsverheiratet werden können, sofern sie für Projekte der Frauenerziehung, Gesundheit und Wohlfahrt in Kohistan arbeiten.
    Ob damit eine konventionelle Heirat gemeint ist oder eine vorübergehende, zeitlich begrenzte Heirat. die auch Affairem Prostitution und Schlimmeres beinhaltet ist unklar.
    Geändert von burgfee (25.05.2012 um 07:58 Uhr)

  2. #12

    AW: Fatwa - Frauen mit Mobiltelefon dürfen mit Säure angegriffen werden

    Im Beitrag #2 war auch dieser Artikel verlinkt

    Published June 7th, 2010
    Iran Permits Brothels Through Temporary Marriages

    Iranian authorities have allocated funds for prostitution houses under the guise of temporary marriage, Al-Osboa has reported. According to the report, the government of Iran has granted one-day, temporary marriages in certain neighborhoods to “eliminate the problem of rape and sexual repression suffered by the Iranian youth.”


    Under the terms of the license, it would be legal for any Iranian or foreigner frequenting a designated house to have sex with a girl if she agrees to temporarily marry him. In Iran, sex outside of marriage is a crime, in some cases punishable with up to one hundred lashes, or in the case of adultery, the death sentence. When a temporary marriage is instituted in Shia Islam, a man and woman contract a mut’a for a limited period of time and for a specific amount of money that the man must pay to the woman.
    According to the official announcement in the cities of Qom and Mashad, the price per night is between twenty and fifty dollars, depending on whether the girl is a virgin or not in addition to her beauty. Critics, however, have said that this is just an excuse to bypass restrictions on prostitution. According to the Kuwait Times, the “homes have become a breeding to the whims and desires of some officials and Shiite clerics.”
    http://www.albawaba.com/behind-news/...rary-marriages

    2010 haben iranische Autoritäten Freudenhäuser für zeitbegrenzte Heiraten zugelassen. Die Regierung hatte Ein-Tag-Hochzeiten zugelassen, um dem Problem der Entführungen und Vergewaltigungen Jugendlicher Herr zu werden.

    Unter dieser neuen Regelung ist es iranischen Männern und auch Ausländern erlaubt ganz legal Freudenhäuser zu frequentieren und Sex mit Mädchen zu haben, wenn sie der Ein-Tags-Ehe mit ihm zustimmen.

    Sex außerhalb der Ehe ist im Iran ein Verbrechen, daß mit 100 Peitschenhieben bestraft wird. Ehebruch wird mit der Todesstrafe belegt.


    Wenn eine zeirbegrenzte Ehe im Shia-Islam zulässig ist, bezeugen sie diese Ehe vor einem mut'a. Da wird der Zeitraum und der Betrag, den der Mann an die Frau zu zahlen hat festgelegt. Ob und wieviel der mu'a für seine Dienste erhält ist dort nicht geschrieben. In den Städten Qom and Mashad liegt der Preis zwischen 20 und 50 Dollar, abhängig von Jungfräulichkeit und Schönheit des Mädchens. Kritiker sagen, das sei ein Umgehen der Restriktionen gegen Prostitution. Wie die Kuweit times schrieb, weckten diese Häuser Wünsche und Begierden der Beamten und schiitischen Klerikern.
    Geändert von burgfee (25.05.2012 um 09:49 Uhr)

  3. #13

    AW: Fatwa - Frauen mit Mobiltelefon dürfen mit Säure angegriffen werden

    Noch ein Link aus Beitrag #2

    May 8, 2012
    Special Dispatch No.4707
    Former Pakistani Lawmaker Denounces Secular Education for Women, Justifies Honor Killings: "Killing of Women In the Name of Honor Is a 'Local Custom and Religious Practice,'" Warns Female Western NGO Staff that They will Be Captured and Given Away as Brides

    Maulana Abdul Haleem
    In a Friday sermon, former Pakistani lawmaker and prominent Islamic cleric Maulana Abdul Haleem justified honor killings of women who opt for secular education, and has threatened to forcibly marry off female staff of secular non-governmental organizations (NGOs) who visit the district of Kohistan to work with women's education, health, and other welfare projects.
    Maulana Abdul Haleem, who was born in 1922 in the town of Pattan in Kohistan district, is a member of the Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam (JUI-F) party and is known to have nurtured a generation of Islamic clerics in Pakistan. In 2002 he was elected a Member of the National Assembly, the lower house of the parliament, from the platform of Muttahida Majlis-e-Amal (MMA), an alliance of religious-political parties cobbled together at the behest of then-Pakistani military ruler General Pervez Musharraf. According to a Pakistani daily, during his stint as an MP, Maulana Abdul Haleem also declared poppy cultivation in Kohistan to be "in accordance with Islam."[1]
    According to a Pakistani website, Maulana Abdul Haleem is a father of eight sons and seven daughters, and his hobbies include delivering religious education in the form of dars, lessons in the Koran and Hadith.[2]
    The warning against female staff of NGOs was issued in a Friday sermon at the central mosque in the town of Kamila in Kohistan district in Pakistan's Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province, and was confirmed in comments to journalists afterwards.[3] Following the sermon, a journalist asked him if Islamic nations like Saudi Arabia and Iran are violating shari'ah by spending billions on women's education, Maulana Haleem termed their steps as "un-Islamic."[4]
    Following are excerpts from Maulana Abdul Haleem's sermon, as quoted in various Pakistani newspapers:

    On the Modesty Code for Women and Secular Education: "It's Beghairti (Immodesty) to Equip Girls With A Secular Education"; "If A Woman Gets Education, She Would Also Seek A Job, Which Islam Doesn't Allow
    "It's beghairti (immodesty) to equip girls with a secular education…. The Kohistani parents who are sending their girls to schools are acting against 'Islamic Shariah' and the local customs…. The Kohistani culture does not allow parents to send their pardadar (modest) girls to schools."[5]
    "The 'secular' education of women is against Islamic injunctions… If a woman gets education, she would also seek a job, which Islam doesn't allow in any way…."[6]
    "Getting education for degrees by women is repugnant to Islamic injunctions, because if a woman gets a degree, she may use it for job, an act which Islam doesn't allow in absence of mehram (close relatives)…."[7]
    "Several Hadith books [i.e. those containing reports of deeds and sayings of Prophet Muhammad] prohibit girls from receiving degrees and certificates in 'secular education'…. Formal education paves the way for girls to enter the job market."[8]
    On Men's Role Vis-à-vis Women: "The Only Responsibility Men Owe to Women is Sustenance, Not Education…. In Return, the Women should Stay at Home and Look After Their Children"
    "When they [i.e. male members of a family] permit their women to work, they give them a free hand to mix with na-mehrum (men to whom they are not related blood) – by doing so, the girl's father, brother or husband become dayoos [someone who accepts the wrongdoings of female family members] in the eye of the shari'a…."[9]
    "Such people will never enter Paradise….[10]
    "The only responsibility men owe to women is sustenance, not education…. In return, the women should stay at home and look after their children and relatives…."[11]
    "Killing of women in the name of honor is a 'local custom and religious practice' in Kohistan…. If someone witnesses female relatives roaming with ghair mehram (other than close relatives), he can kill her without producing four witnesses [as required under Islamic law for such a punishment]."[12]
    The Threat Against NGOs: "If Women Working in NGOs Enter Kohistan, We Won't Spare Them; We'll Solemnize Their Nikkah (Marriage) with Local Men"
    "Some women from these NGOs visit our houses frequently, mobilizing naive Kohistani women to follow their agenda in the name of health and hygiene education…. This is 'unacceptable to Kohistani culture' …. [They will face] 'dire consequences' …. [and] married female NGO workers will be sent back to their husbands, and the unmarried ones will be wedded to Kohistani men."[13]
    "If the NGOs wanted to work for womenfolk in the district [Kohistan] they should come through proper channel and utilize the government departments. People of Kohistan cannot be influenced by women, and NGOs should immediately stop the practice of sending women to Kohistan, or prepare for the consequences…."[14]
    "If the government is serious about bringing development to Kohistan, it should utilize NGOs' funding itself with the help of local men. Men working for these NGOs can continue their work though… that is not against the Shariah and local culture."[15]
    "These [girls'] schools have become cattle pens while the teachers received salaries without carrying out their duties."[16]
    "If women working in NGOs enter Kohistan, we won't spare them; we will solemnize their nikkah (marriage) with local men."[17]


    Endnotes:
    [1] The Express Tribune (Pakistan), May 6, 2012.

    [2] http://elections.com.pk/candidatedetails.php?id=127, accessed May 7, 2012. The original English of all reports cited in this dispatch has been lightly edited for clarity and standardization.

    [3] The News (Pakistan), May 6, 2012.

    [4] The Express Tribune (Pakistan), May 6, 2012.

    [5] The Express Tribune (Pakistan), May 6, 2012.

    [6] The News (Pakistan), May 6, 2012.

    [7] Dawn (Pakistan), May 6, 2012.

    [8] The Express Tribune (Pakistan), May 6, 2012.

    [9] The Express Tribune (Pakistan), May 6, 2012.

    [10] The Express Tribune (Pakistan), May 6, 2012.

    [11] The Express Tribune (Pakistan), May 6, 2012.

    [12] Dawn (Pakistan), May 6, 2012.

    [13] The Express Tribune (Pakistan), May 6, 2012.

    [14] The News (Pakistan), May 6, 2012.

    [15] The Express Tribune (Pakistan), May 6, 2012.

    [16] The News (Pakistan), May 6, 2012.

    [17] Dawn (Pakistan), May 6, 2012.


    http://www.memri.org/report/en/0/0/0/0/0/840/6345.htm

    In dem Artikel setzt er noch einen drauf: er droht den westlichen NGO's, deren Mtarbeiterinnen zu entführen, Zwangsheirat und sogar Ehrenmord sind für sie vorgesehen.

    Er begründet es damit, wenn Frauen säkular erzogen werden, werden sie später nach einem Job haben wollen und das ist im Islam unzulässig.

  4. #14

    AW: Fatwa - Frauen mit Mobiltelefon dürfen mit Säure angegriffen werden

    Link aus Beitrag #2 über die Säureattentate für Handybenutzerinnen.
    Bookmark and Share Text Size
    May 20, 2012
    Special Dispatch No.4742

    Pakistani Women Writers Denounce Islamic Clerics' Fatwas Against Women's Use Of Cell Phones And Access To Secular Education


    Former Pakistani lawmaker and cleric Maulana Abdul Haleem recently issued a fatwa (Islamic degree) against secular education and justifying honor killings of women.[1]The fatwa was issued in a sermon during a weekly Friday prayer in Kohistan district in Pakistan's Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province. Haleem also threatened that women from secular NGOs who visit Kohistan district may be married off forcibly to local men. In a similar incident, a cleric announced a fatwa in a mosque in Noshki town of Pakistan's Baluchistan province, justifying acid attacks on women who use cell phones.

    Both fatwas elicited no condemnation from the main Pakistani media. However, two Pakistani women – an author and a blogger –slammed the clerics' fatwas, arguing that there is an urgent need to stop such fatwas against women. In an article titled "Fatwas Against Women: From The One Who Wears Bangles," Fouzia Saeed – an author and a social scientist – stated: "I think it is time for our society to forcefully stop such people who not only violate the dignity and safety of women citizens, but also give a bad name to Islam…"

    In another article "Our Stunted Society," blogger and communications consultant Tazeen Javed argued that such fatwas are breeding narrow-mindedness. She wrote: "A country like ours can ill-afford adventurism of any kind, but most dangerous is the practice of resorting to a fatwa to get a point across. Not only does this breed a narrow and rigid view of issues, it also leaves no room for dialogue, debate, and consultation, making us an increasingly 'stunted' and intolerant society."


    Fouzia Saeed: "A Fatwa Was Announced In A Mosque On May 11, Stating That Any Woman Using A Cell Phone Will Have Acid Thrown In Her Face"

    Following are excerpts from Fouzia Saeed's article:[2]

    "Fatwas against women are becoming common again. In Noshki, Baluchistan, a fatwa was announced in a mosque on May 11, stating that any woman using a cell phone will have acid thrown in her face. Another fatwa was issued in Kohistan about two weeks ago, warning 'NGO women' that they would be forcefully married to their local men if they dared to enter the area. There was a time when such fatwas were more common, resulting in serious punishments inflicted on women who dared to venture beyond the four walls of their homes.

    "However, over the last four years there has been a steady improvement in creating space for women to be more visible in public. After decades of repression, women have turned the cycle in a different direction by building a high level of solidarity among women from many backgrounds. The awareness that one woman's advancement is linked to breaking the shackles of others has gained ground. Not just women; many men are fully in support of this process of change.

    "Who will tell the 'fatwa guys' that they are nearly an extinct species? Who will tell these men that they need to wake up to 2012. Who will tell them that our interest in them is limited to a single news item? Perhaps they should be kept in a museum with the caption 'we used to have people like this who thought work for women was 'un-Islamic' but marrying them by force was 'Islamic.' Idiots who thought talking on a cell phone was 'un-Islamic' but throwing acid in women's faces was 'Islamic'!'

    "I think it is time for our society to forcefully stop such people who not only violate the dignity and safety of women citizens, but also give a bad name to Islam, a religion which places a priority on the dignity of women."

    "I Am More Worried About Those Who Put On A Progressive Facade And Continue To Reinforce Myths That Imply Women Are Inferior"

    "I am not so worried about these fatwas because I am confident that our society will not let itself regress. I am more worried about those who put on a progressive facade and continue to reinforce myths that imply women are inferior. Our society takes these 'put-downs' for granted and uses them in a patronizing manner.

    "Putting down a man by calling him a 'woman,' and thus a coward, has gone on for generations. These 'humiliations,' while being common among the ignorant, do concern me more when they are commonly used by our leaders.

    "About two weeks ago, a senior minister raised his hands and announced that he was not wearing bangles, implying that he was not a coward but was 'brave' like a 'man' and would handle the violence in Karachi with a 'man's courage.' Ironically, men with their 'bravery' and 'courage' have already given that city enough trouble…

    "I am a woman who wears bangles yet feels quite brave. I am also a daughter of a brave woman, a woman who wears bangles and has felt very brave all her life. I salute my mother today on Mothers' Day and all the mothers who wear bangles while standing bravely…"

    Tazeen Javed: "Fatwas Are So Commonplace That Even A Power Utility Company Resorted To Seeking One A Few Years Back To Get People To Pay For Their Electricity"

    Following are excerpts from Tazeen Javed's article:[3]

    "[We] are teeming millions of people who cannot feed themselves, have limited access to energy, and will be dumber and weaker in the future because of the stunted mental and physical growth of our children due to the lack of education. At such a juncture in history, amongst us are individuals who issue fatwas and promote misogyny and obscurantism against hygiene, education, health, and progress.

    "The latest fatwa is one issued by a former legislator. Maulana Abdul Haleem of the Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam (Fazlur Rehman group) came up with a series of misogynist fatwas clearly detailing what the priorities of his political and religious followers should be. For starters, the fatwa declares formal education for women to be un-Islamic. As if declaring the act of going to school and getting an irreligious education was not enough, he also reprimanded the parents in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa's Kohistan district who send their daughters to school and asked them to terminate their education. He also strictly told them that failure to do so would earn them a spot in eternal hellfire.

    "The fatwa goes on to declare all NGOs working in the region as 'hubs of immodesty.' He first blamed the women working in those NGOs for mobilizing the local women on health and hygiene issues and then called on the local men to marry the unmarried NGO workers – forcefully, if they have to – to make them stay at home.

    "In short, a former legislator issues fatwas during a Friday sermon inciting hatred against a group of people (NGO workers) and declaring the constitutional rights of getting an education for half of the population forbidden and no one, barring a few bloggers and tweeters, raises even an eyebrow…

    "Had it been just one fatwa from one cleric in one remote corner, perhaps, we could have ignored it. However, unfortunately, we churn out one edict after another without realizing what the rest of the world may think of us. If declaring hair implant services and vegetarian items, such as potato chips, halal is considered a viable marketing gimmick, then the abduction of minor girls from minority communities also gets legitimized through decrees by half-literate mullahs [clerics].

    "Fatwas are so commonplace that even a power utility company resorted to seeking one a few years back to get people to pay for their electricity. Since that utility is still burdened with thousands of unpaid bills, we know how useless that fatwa turned out to be.

    "A country like ours can ill-afford adventurism of any kind but most dangerous is the practice of resorting to a fatwa to get a point across. Not only does this breed a narrow and rigid view of issues, it also leaves no room for dialogue, debate and consultation, making us an increasingly 'stunted' and intolerant society."


    Endnotes:

    [1] Former Pakistani Lawmaker Denounces Secular Education for Women, Justifies Honor Killings: "Killing of Women In the Name of Honor Is a 'Local Custom and Religious Practice,'" Warns Female Western NGO Staff that They will Be Captured and Given Away as Brides, MEMRI Special Dispatches Series No. 4707, May 8, 2012 (http://www.memri.org/report/en/0/0/0/0/0/840/6345.htm)

    [2] The Express Tribune (Pakistan), May 14, 2012.

    [3] The Express Tribune (Pakistan), May 12, 2012.
    http://www.memri.org/report/en/0/0/0/0/0/0/6387.htm

Seite 2 von 2 ErsteErste 12

Aktive Benutzer

Aktive Benutzer

Aktive Benutzer in diesem Thema: 1 (Registrierte Benutzer: 0, Gäste: 1)

Ähnliche Themen

  1. Berlin: 2 Frauen angegriffen
    Von Realist59 im Forum Islam-Terrorismus
    Antworten: 3
    Letzter Beitrag: 13.08.2015, 21:43
  2. Antworten: 0
    Letzter Beitrag: 22.02.2015, 17:14
  3. Antworten: 0
    Letzter Beitrag: 22.02.2015, 16:00

Berechtigungen

  • Neue Themen erstellen: Nein
  • Themen beantworten: Nein
  • Anhänge hochladen: Nein
  • Beiträge bearbeiten: Nein
  •